NY GIANTS

LETS GO BLUE!!!!!!

go anyone as long as Patriots LOSE

Screw you,

Big Blue appreciation or dont post

LAWRENCE TYNES FOR MVP

R.W. McQuarters can sit on the bench next season

-andy

Big Blue appreciation or dont post

The 49ers are going to run wild all over that Superbowl, you'll see.

Believe.

THE GIANT'S ARE GOING TO THE SUPERBOWL BABY!!!!! <3333


Seriously tho, I wanted to kick Tynes in the face, and if they wouldn't have caught Snee we wouldn't have gone into overtime. But the packers can just cry at home because they're not going to the Superbowl because THE GIANT'S ARE!!!! <33

Michelle

The 49ers are going to run wild all over that Superbowl, you'll see.

What fucking planet are you living on?

Gang green...

*waves a tiny flag and goes back to hiding*

Let's look at the past 5 years of SB losers and how they did the next season...

06' Chicago (lost SB)    07' Chicago 7-9
05' Seattle (lost SB)    06' Seattle 9-7
04' Philly (lost SB)    05' Philly 6-10
03' Carolina (lost SB)    04' Carolina 7-9
02' Oakland (lost SB)    03' Oakland 4-12

What does this mean?  It means be my guest, go ahead and lose the Super Bowl to the Pats this year.  It'll just mean next year is all the more sweet when the Giants see the re-emergence of the real Eli Manning and tank it big time.

Why is there a hole in the roof of Texas Stadium?  So God can watch America's Team play football.  Don't you forget it.

Skimmel

Let's look at the past 5 years of SB losers and how they did the next season...

06' Chicago (lost SB)     07' Chicago 7-9
05' Seattle (lost SB)     06' Seattle 9-7
04' Philly (lost SB)     05' Philly 6-10
03' Carolina (lost SB)     04' Carolina 7-9
02' Oakland (lost SB)     03' Oakland 4-12

What does this mean?  It means be my guest, go ahead and lose the Super Bowl to the Pats this year.  It'll just mean next year is all the more sweet when the Giants see the re-emergence of the real Eli Manning and tank it big time.

Why is there a hole in the roof of Texas Stadium?  So God can watch America's Team play football.  Don't you forget it.

Skimmel

Blah, blah ,blah, my team is golfing, blah, blah, blah, wait til next year, blah, blah, blah, Eli sucks.

Bottom line, there IS a Manning in the Super Bowl, and it ain't Peyton.

T

PS: at least Romo can hold Jessica Simpson, cuz he ain't holding a Super Bowl trophy

Let's look at the past 5 years of SB losers and how they did the next season...

06' Chicago (lost SB)     07' Chicago 7-9
05' Seattle (lost SB)     06' Seattle 9-7
04' Philly (lost SB)     05' Philly 6-10
03' Carolina (lost SB)     04' Carolina 7-9
02' Oakland (lost SB)     03' Oakland 4-12

What does this mean?  It means be my guest, go ahead and lose the Super Bowl to the Pats this year.  It'll just mean next year is all the more sweet when the Giants see the re-emergence of the real Eli Manning and tank it big time.

Why is there a hole in the roof of Texas Stadium?  So God can watch America's Team play football.  Don't you forget it.

Skimmel

The hole is to let the foul stink out of texas stadium from all those Texans getting together in one place.

Hey, T.O. called and he needs someone to hold him.  He cant stop crying about how his girlfriend, Romo has been picked on.

Cowboys choked bigtime.  Typical cowgirl hate.

....Go....Eagles..?


...../cry

This is a direct quote from Mr Skimmel to me on my face book

Enjoy






"you have obviously upgraded to smoking crack.

even if we ignore the fact that the boys have smacked up the giants TWICE already this year, and we ignore the fact that they don't even have jeremy shockey for this go-round, and we say that by some miracle the giants pull the upset this weekend... you really think they're going to be able to go to lambeua field and win?

boy, you are outside your goddamn mind."

It is true that I was mistaken in my assessment of the Giants playoff chances.  They have played very well and I must eat those words. 

However, all I'm saying is that should they go and lose in the SB, statistically, the future looks dim for them.

Oh, and I can tolerate Giants fans.  I even root for them twice a year... when they play the Eagles.  Never admit to being an Eagles fan.  Seriously.

And you can talk all you want about Romo's relationships, but there isn't a one among you that wouldn't "hold" Jessica Simpson if given the chance.

Skimmel

And you can talk all you want about Romo's relationships, but there isn't a one among you that wouldn't "hold" Jessica Simpson if given the chance.

True, true.

Just not a week before the biggest game of my career.

T

And you can talk all you want about Romo's relationships, but there isn't a one among you that wouldn't "hold" Jessica Simpson if given the chance.

Skimmel

Is she allowed to talk? That would alter my choice.

[/quote]

Is she allowed to talk? That would alter my choice.
[/quote]

Come on Sam.
you know damn right that wouldn't matter.

Ha ha ha!!! 

All season long these haters talk down about big blue.  Even if they lose, they manned up and kicked serious ass through adversity up til then.

Besides, the Giants let themselves down in the game vs Pats.  This isnt me being delusional and saying they arent a dynasty or Brady isnt a demi-god, but in any event, they had the pats beat and let them back in the game.  It should be a good game for football fans.

I salute the Giants for their effort and hope they win.

Go Blue.

Go Islanders!!!

I too am routing for Joe Montana to bring the 49rs to the super bowl this year!!!! Gooooooo 49rs!!!!!

...
:)

YES!

I find it funny that im not the only shmuck who only cares about the 49ers back in their Joe Montana days

I find it funny that im not the only shmuck who only cares about the 49ers back in their Joe Montana days

Certainly not the only one.  It was always so much fun to watch Montana, Rice and Craig roll over everyone that got in the way.

I'm taking the Patriots to win and the Giants to cover that ridiculous 13 point spread...good thing I'll be in Vegas

"This isnt me being delusional and saying they arent a dynasty "

Are they a dynasty?.. I mean yes they have won 3 in recent memory and they get called a dynasty....  but are they really?  WERE those three wins all in subsequent years?... and if they were and someone can give evidence.. to quote 3 consecutive years in which the pats WON the super bowl then I will agree that yes they have/had a dynasty.. and then if the requirements for having a dynasty in a sport is to win the premiere game in that sport 3 seasios consecutively.. then i can think of some other teams that have dynasties as well... ynkees 98,99,00... the devils in tghe early 90's two name but a pair.. anyways Im actually curious to see if the pats currently do fit this aparent qualification of having a dynasty (3 consecutive super bowl wins)

I want the giants to win
I HATE the pats
bellicheck (sp) made a deal with satan to get the pats so many wins
boston sucks

Newsflash...if 3 consecutive Super Bowl wins equals a dynasty then there has not been a NFL dynasty. NFL Dynasty is usually considered if there is four wins in a ten year span. Only the Steelers and 49ers have done this. Now the Cowboys were considered a dynasty of sorts in the 70s because they made it to five super bowls in ten years and came away with two wins. They werea mini dynasty in the 90s when they won three out of four Super Bowls.

The Patiots have won 3 out of the last six Super Bowls and are in another one this year, which would easily give them 4 in ten years.

"This isnt me being delusional and saying they arent a dynasty "

Are they a dynasty?.. I mean yes they have won 3 in recent memory and they get called a dynasty....  but are they really?  WERE those three wins all in subsequent years?... and if they were and someone can give evidence.. to quote 3 consecutive years in which the pats WON the super bowl then I will agree that yes they have/had a dynasty.. and then if the requirements for having a dynasty in a sport is to win the premiere game in that sport 3 seasios consecutively.. then i can think of some other teams that have dynasties as well... ynkees 98,99,00... the devils in tghe early 90's two name but a pair.. anyways Im actually curious to see if the pats currently do fit this aparent qualification of having a dynasty (3 consecutive super bowl wins)

In Kraft's first 13 seasons in the NFL (1994-2006), no other NFL team won more, or more often, than the New England Patriots. In addition to their many Super Bowl, conference and division championships under Kraft's leadership, the Patriots also earned the distinction as the NFL's winningest franchise since 1994. Entering the 2007 season, the Patriots recorded more victories (144), including playoff victories (15), than any other NFL team and own the highest winning percentages in overall games (.629) and playoff games (.714) in the last 13 seasons.
Few owners in the history of professional sports have experienced the level of success enjoyed by the Kraft family over the last six seasons. In that time, the Patriots have won three Super Bowls, three conference championships and a franchise-record four consecutive division titles. In 2003 and 2004, the Patriots compiled back-to-back 17-2 seasons that were highlighted by consecutive Super Bowl championships. The 34 total victories in a two-year span set an 85-year NFL record. During that time, the Patriots also claimed pro football's consecutive-win records with the longest win streaks in the postseason (10), regular season (18) and with an overall 21-game win streak. Along the way, the Patriots also won 21 consecutive games at Gillette Stadium, the longest home win streak in franchise history.

Consecutive wins is not a necessary element to be a Dynasty.  The cowgirls were a dynasty in the 90's and niners were one in the 80's.

The current patriots set the standard for winning ... until Superbowl XLII.  Go G-men.

I like turtles