Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

Matt D
Platinum Member
Photographer extraordinaire!
Posts: 1998
Thank Yous: 557

15 years 10 months ago #42336 by Matt D (MattD)

Replied by Matt D (MattD) on topic Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

I think you have 2 and 3 switched Charlie. The Prayer is Divine Vestments, the Ceremony is Holy Vestments. But we get the point

Elias Ashby
Proprietor of the Ashby Family General Store

Lord Templar Rayven Nightwing of the Order of Holy Light

(OOG - Matt D. - Photographer)

Barak Tellinghast
Administrator
Posts: 204
Thank Yous: 28

15 years 10 months ago #42343 by Barak Tellinghast (Barak Tellinghast)

Replied by Barak Tellinghast (Barak Tellinghast) on topic Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

No, the soak cannot be stacked with other soaks. In addition, the Prayer: Divine Vestements does NOT grant a soak, it grants a Threshold.

Sir Barak Tellinghast
Knight of Drega'Mire
Guardian of Vardamir

OOG: Jason Turqman
Officer

JoDios
Elite Member
That guy with the muffin hat.
Posts: 717
Thank Yous: 0

15 years 10 months ago #42346 by JoDios (JoDios)

Replied by JoDios (JoDios) on topic Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

To add onto what Jason said, no soaks stack unless the soak specifically says it does.

OOG: Jo

Odo Garaath
Platinum Member
Back and Ready For More!
Posts: 1968
Thank Yous: 12

15 years 10 months ago #42348 by Odo Garaath (Odo)

Replied by Odo Garaath (Odo) on topic Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

Would wearing armor while NEF'd help in soaking damage? (I believe, one can have one physical and one magical soak active at any time.)

"Praise be to Enax, and blessing to his followers."

(Tom Senger )

Erim Walker
Elite Member
I love Travance. There are shirtless men EVERYWHER
Posts: 708
Thank Yous: 0

15 years 10 months ago #42349 by Erim Walker (shiva14b)

Replied by Erim Walker (shiva14b) on topic Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

As a note - this allows you to call multiple waylays on a single victim, provided you are not hit by someone before you get them all out or you use another non-surprise attack.

SINGLE victim?

So we still can't, say, move down a line of (let's assume for this example "incredibly oblivious") people calling "waylay" until someone notices what's going on and does something about it?

"Ok we can attack... but if we miss, we'll hit the villagers."
"I'm willing to take that chance!"

Things I am no longer allowed to do in an RPG :
31. The backup trap handler is not whoever has the most HP at the time.
73. Not allowed to name my cudgel Ceremonial Whoopass Stick.
74. My thief's battle cry is not "Run And Live"

[OOG Jenna

THENPC
Platinum Member
Assassins Do It From Behind
Posts: 1185
Thank Yous: 126

15 years 10 months ago #42359 by THENPC (THENPC)

Replied by THENPC (THENPC) on topic Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

Oh, no, you totally can.

The thing about a single victim was a clarification because the surprise rules were originally changed to keep me... erm... rogues from getting behind someone and waylaying them a whole bunch of times in a row until they ate it.

Adversus Nox Noctis,
Sir Lethias Discretion Nathaniel Peregrin Christopher Wrathchild VonRitter
Knight of Travance
Putting the Shiv in Chivalry Since 1202

Mortem facit omnes aequales, vitam facit omnes fratres
Vince The NPC;
RM, RPM, ST

Moderators: Lois Heimdell (LoisMaxwell)

Time to create page: 0.477 seconds

Rules Updates: Surprise, and Negative Energy Fortitude

Random Quote

Search